Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Got Needs? Kings County Community Survey

The Got Needs Survey serves as a county-wide, perception-based assessment and is a valuable community instrument for amplifying the voices of Kings County residents, with a particular focus on those who are most vulnerable.

.

Orchestrated by the Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO) and undertaken in partnership with Kings Partnership, the Got Needs survey plays a significant role in assisting KCAO to identify community priorities over the upcoming two-year period. This involves the expansion of existing programs, pursuit of funding for initiatives, and reinforcement of deficiencies within Kings County communities.

.

Got Needs offers individuals the platform to express their own perspectives and yields invaluable insights that steer the course of community initiatives toward effective solutions. Your participation in this year's Got Needs survey is essential to ensuring that the needs of our communities are recognized and addressed!

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

19.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with childcare County: Kings

12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with preschool

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with preschool

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with preschool County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with preschool County: Kings

10.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community County: Kings

47.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (47.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare County: Kings

61.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare County: Kings

38.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Literacy

Education / Literacy

Education / Literacy

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes

Value
Compared to:

Education / Literacy

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes County: Kings

9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English County: Kings

22.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English County: Kings

22.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English County: Kings

18.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (18.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings

44.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites County: Kings

36.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activities County: Kings

42.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel recreation activities are accessible County: Kings

87.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (87.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75.5%).
Prior Value
(75.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel recreation activities are affordable County: Kings

79.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (79.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (61.6%).
Prior Value
(61.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are accessible County: Kings

86.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (86.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (85.3%).
Prior Value
(85.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are affordable County: Kings

86.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (86.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75.4%).
Prior Value
(75.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are high quality County: Kings

68.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (68.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (50.5%).
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel recreation areas in their community are safe County: Kings

78.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (78.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75.7%).
Prior Value
(75.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area

Value
Compared to:

Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents Who Feel There Are Enough Parks In Their Area County: Kings

65.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (65.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.4%).
Prior Value
(60.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (66.5%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(66.5%)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Activities in their Area County: Kings

47.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (47.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (22.2%).
Prior Value
(22.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (50.4%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(50.4%)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Feel There are Enough Recreation Areas in the Community County: Kings

58.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (58.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (35.7%).
Prior Value
(35.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (57.9%), the target has  been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(57.9%)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community County: Kings

28.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (31.2%).
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community County: Kings

20.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community County: Kings

30.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (30.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (26.9%).
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community County: Kings

35.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (35.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (49.2%).
Prior Value
(49.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community County: Kings

48.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (48.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.2%).
Prior Value
(71.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community County: Kings

57.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (57.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.1%).
Prior Value
(81.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Stated there are Parks in their Community County: Kings

64.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (64.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (95.0%).
Prior Value
(95.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (100.0%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(100.0%)

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community County: Kings

23.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (23.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community County: Kings

62.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (62.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.9%).
Prior Value
(83.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community County: Kings

42.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.5%).
Prior Value
(59.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community County: Kings

27.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (27.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (33.1%).
Prior Value
(33.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community County: Kings

39.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (39.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.3%).
Prior Value
(60.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community County: Kings

37.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.6%).
Prior Value
(56.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community County: Kings

17.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (15.4%).
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community County: Kings

28.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (37.1%).
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community County: Kings

49.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (49.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.