Search for Indicators
Active Living
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Physical Activity
9th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
9th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
42.4%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 42.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (37.8%), Kings has a value of 42.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(37.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
Prior Value
(43.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Kings
Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Kings
65.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 65.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 85.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 65.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (94.2%), Kings has a value of 65.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Kings has a value of 65.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (65.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (68.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(68.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Access to Parks County: Kings
Access to Parks County: Kings
43.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 43.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 69.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 43.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 24.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 9.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (79.5%), Kings has a value of 43.1% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
CA Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (43.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Kings
Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Kings
15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (15.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(22.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Are Obese County: Kings
Adults Who Are Obese County: Kings
32.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (28.8%), Kings has a value of 32.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Kings has a value of 32.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (32.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (50.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Kings
72.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 72.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Kings has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Kings has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (72.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(78.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym County: Kings
Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym County: Kings
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the CA Value (18.7%), Kings has a value of 14.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.1%) is less than the previously measured value (15.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine County: Kings
Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine County: Kings
61.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 61.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 66.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (69.3%), Kings has a value of 61.2% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
CA Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Kings has a value of 61.2% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (61.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (49.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites County: Kings
Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing local recreation activites County: Kings
36.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are adult sports teams in their community County: Kings
28.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (31.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(31.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are bike paths in their community County: Kings
20.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (28.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are community gardens in their community County: Kings
30.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (30.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (26.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are fitness classes in their community County: Kings
35.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (35.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (49.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(49.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are gyms in their community County: Kings
48.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (48.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(71.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are libraries in their community County: Kings
57.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (57.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(81.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are performing arts in their community County: Kings
23.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (23.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are playgrounds in their community County: Kings
62.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (62.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(83.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are skate parks in their community County: Kings
42.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(59.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are splash pads in their community County: Kings
27.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (27.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (33.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(33.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are sports features in their community County: Kings
39.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (39.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(60.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are swimming pools in their community County: Kings
37.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(56.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are visual arts in their community County: Kings
17.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (15.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are walking trails in their community County: Kings
28.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (37.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(37.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community County: Kings
Respondents who stated there are youth sports teams in their community County: Kings
49.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (49.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Workers who Walk to Work County: Kings
Workers who Walk to Work County: Kings
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 1.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Kings has a value of 1.5% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Kings has a value of 1.5% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.