Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

COVID-19 At Risk

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Kings

Current Value:

Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Kings

15,971
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Kings

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Kings

3,351
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings

1,846
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Kings

Current Value:

Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Kings

37.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Kings has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.1%).
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Kings

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Kings

4,930
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Kings

7.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Kings has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Kings has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Kings

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Kings has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Kings has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (29.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Heart Disease

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Heart Disease

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Heart Disease County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults with Heart Disease County: Kings

6.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (7.3%), Kings has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Kings

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Kings

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.0%), Kings has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Value
Compared to:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Value
Compared to:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Kings

Current Value:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Kings

34.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 34.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (34.8%), Kings has a value of 34.8%.
CA Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Kings has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Kings

64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Kings has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kings has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Kings

68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (58.0%), Kings has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(58.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kings has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (68.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.0%).
Prior Value
(68.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Kings

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (18.0%), Kings has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Kings has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (24.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Kings

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Kings has a value of 5.0%.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kings has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Asthma County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults with Asthma County: Kings

16.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.9%).
Prior Value
(20.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kings

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

COPD: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Kings

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.