Search for Indicators
COVID-19 At Risk
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Population Over Age 65 (Count)
Value
Compared to:
Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Kings
Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Kings
15,971
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
Value
Compared to:
People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Kings
People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Kings
3,351
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
Value
Compared to:
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings
1,846
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold)
Value
Compared to:
Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Kings
Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold) County: Kings
37.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Kings has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)
Value
Compared to:
Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Kings
Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Kings
4,930
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
Adults with Diabetes County: Kings
Adults with Diabetes County: Kings
7.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Kings has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Kings has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Diabetes: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Kings
Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Kings
29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Kings has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Kings has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (29.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Heart Disease
Value
Compared to:
Adults with Heart Disease County: Kings
Adults with Heart Disease County: Kings
6.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
![Compared to the CA Value (6.9%), Kings has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
CA Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Kings
Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Kings
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Heart Failure: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Kings
Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Kings
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (10.0%), Kings has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
High Blood Pressure Prevalence
Value
Compared to:
High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Kings
High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Kings
34.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 34.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (34.8%), Kings has a value of 34.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
CA Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Kings has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Kings
Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Kings
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Kings has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kings has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Hypertension: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Kings
Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Kings
68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (58.0%), Kings has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(58.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kings has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (68.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(68.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Kings
Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Kings
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (18.0%), Kings has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Kings has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (24.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Stroke: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Kings
Stroke: Medicare Population County: Kings
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Kings has a value of 5.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kings has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Asthma
Value
Compared to:
Adults with Asthma County: Kings
Adults with Asthma County: Kings
16.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(20.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Asthma: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kings
Asthma: Medicare Population County: Kings
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
COPD: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
COPD: Medicare Population County: Kings
COPD: Medicare Population County: Kings
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
![Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.