ABUSE | NEGLECT | HOUSEHOLD DYSFUNCTION | |
Physical | Physical | Mental illness | Incarcerated relative |
Emotional | Emotional | Mother treated violently | Substance abuse |
Sexual | Divorce |
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) come in many forms, from physical and mental abuse to neglect and household dysfunction. In 1998, CDC-Kaiser Permanente published a groundbreaking study that investigated the impact of ACEs on physical and mental health problems in over 17,000 adults. During the study, the adults were given a survey asking about 10 different types of ACEs and if they had experienced them prior to the age of 18. The study showed a direct correlation between ACEs and future health complications.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Adult Arrest Rate
Adult Arrest Rate County: Kings
Adult Arrest Rate County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 49.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Kings has a value of 49.9 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (49.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (62.9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Adults who Binge Drink
Adults who Binge Drink County: Kings
Adults who Binge Drink County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Armona
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Armona
![Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Armona has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Armona has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Avenal
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Avenal
![Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Corcoran
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Corcoran
![Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Grangeville
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Grangeville
![Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hanford
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hanford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Hanford has a value of 16.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hanford has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hardwick
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hardwick
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Home Garden
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Home Garden
![Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Kettleman City
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Kettleman City
![Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore Station
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore Station
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Stratford
Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Stratford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Stratford has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Stratford has a value of 15.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide
Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide County: Kings
Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 22.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (19.0%), Kings has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress
Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress County: Kings
Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Kings has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings
Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (10.5), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.9), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level
Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Kings has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Kings has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Armona
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Armona
![Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 18.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 18.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Armona has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Armona has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Armona has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Armona value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Avenal
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Avenal
![Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Avenal value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Corcoran
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Corcoran
![Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Corcoran value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Grangeville
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Grangeville
![Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Grangeville value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hanford
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hanford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Hanford value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hardwick
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hardwick
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Hardwick value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Home Garden
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Home Garden
![Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Home Garden value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Kettleman City
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Kettleman City
![Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kettleman City value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Lemoore value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore Station
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore Station
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Lemoore Station value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Stratford
Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Stratford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Stratford value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Depression: Medicare Population
Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings
Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Frequent Mental Distress
Frequent Mental Distress County: Kings
Frequent Mental Distress County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Kings has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (21.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives
Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings
Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (9.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Respondents who Have Been Victims of Violence in their Homes
Respondents who Have Been Victims of Violence in their Homes County: Kings
Respondents who Have Been Victims of Violence in their Homes County: Kings
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (11.7%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Respondents Who Have Witnessed Violence In their Home
Respondents Who Have Witnessed Violence In their Home County: Kings
Respondents Who Have Witnessed Violence In their Home County: Kings
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (11.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households
Children in Single-Parent Households County: Kings
Children in Single-Parent Households County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 24.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 24.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Kings has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Kings has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Armona
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Armona
![Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Armona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Armona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Armona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Armona value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Avenal
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Avenal
![Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Avenal value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Corcoran
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Corcoran
![Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Corcoran value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Grangeville
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Grangeville
![Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Grangeville value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hanford
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hanford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Hanford value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hardwick
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hardwick
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Hardwick value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Home Garden
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Home Garden
![Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Home Garden value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Kettleman City
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Kettleman City
![Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Kettleman City value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Lemoore value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore Station
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore Station
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Lemoore Station value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Stratford
Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Stratford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Stratford value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Teens who have Used Alcohol
Teens who have Used Alcohol County: Kings
Teens who have Used Alcohol County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 40.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (23.1%), Kings has a value of 40.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (40.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Youth not in School or Working
Youth not in School or Working County: Kings
Youth not in School or Working County: Kings
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 2.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Kings has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Kings has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Armona
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Armona
![Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Armona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Armona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Armona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Armona value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Avenal
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Avenal
![Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Avenal value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Corcoran
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Corcoran
![Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Corcoran value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Grangeville
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Grangeville
![Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (7.9%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (6.6%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hanford
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hanford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Hanford value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hardwick
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hardwick
![Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Hardwick value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Home Garden
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Home Garden
![Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Home Garden value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Kettleman City
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Kettleman City
![Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Kettleman City value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Over time, the Lemoore value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore Station
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore Station
![Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Lemoore Station value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Stratford
Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Stratford
![Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Over time, the Stratford value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)