Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Education

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Education

Education

Respondents who need assistance with education support County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with education support County: Kings

7.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education

Respondents who need assistance with tutoring

Value
Compared to:

Education

Respondents who need assistance with tutoring

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with tutoring County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with tutoring County: Kings

3.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (3.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Child Care Centers

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Child Care Centers

Value
Compared to:

Child Care Centers County: Kings

Current Value:

Child Care Centers County: Kings

3.6
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 3.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.1), Kings has a value of 3.6 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Kings has a value of 3.6 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (3.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.6).
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel affordability is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

26.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel childcare is affordable

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel childcare is affordable

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel childcare is affordable County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel childcare is affordable County: Kings

78.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (78.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (43.0%).
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel location is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

15.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel operational hours is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

23.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel there are enough childcare options and locations

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel there are enough childcare options and locations

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel there are enough childcare options and locations County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel there are enough childcare options and locations County: Kings

75.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (75.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who feel transportation is a barrier preventing them from utilizing childcare County: Kings

19.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with childcare County: Kings

12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with preschool

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who need assistance with preschool

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with preschool County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with preschool County: Kings

10.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Use Childcare in the Community County: Kings

47.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (47.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who utilize center-based childcare County: Kings

61.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who utilize home-based childcare County: Kings

38.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has  been met.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Value
Compared to:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher County: Kings

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher County: Kings

14.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Kings has a value of 14.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Kings has a value of 14.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Kings

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Kings

74.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 74.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 74.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Kings has a value of 74.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Kings has a value of 74.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Educational Attainment

Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Kings

Current Value:

Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Kings

94.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 94.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 94.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.1%), Kings has a value of 94.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (95.0%), Kings has a value of 94.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Literacy

Education / Literacy

Education / Literacy

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes

Value
Compared to:

Education / Literacy

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes

Value
Compared to:

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who need assistance with English language classes County: Kings

9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help reading English County: Kings

22.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help speaking English County: Kings

22.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who stated someone in their household needs help writing English County: Kings

18.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (18.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Number of Summer Meals Served

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

Number of Summer Meals Served

Value
Compared to:

Number of Summer Meals Served County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Summer Meals Served County: Kings

62,339
Meals
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (62,339) is greater and better than the previously measured value (59,851).
Prior Value
(59,851)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Number of Summer Meals Sites

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

Number of Summer Meals Sites

Value
Compared to:

Number of Summer Meals Sites County: Kings

Current Value:

Number of Summer Meals Sites County: Kings

28
Sites
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (28) is greater and better than the previously measured value (27).
Prior Value
(27)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Student-to-Teacher Ratio County: Kings

Current Value:

Student-to-Teacher Ratio County: Kings

21.2
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 21.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 21.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.9), Kings has a value of 21.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Kings has a value of 21.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (21.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.4).
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

48.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 48.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.8%), Kings has a value of 48.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (48.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (51.6%).
Prior Value
(51.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

14.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.0%), Kings has a value of 14.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

37%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 37% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (42%), Kings has a value of 37% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(42%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (37%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (31%).
Prior Value
(31%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

37%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 37% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 32%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Kings has a value of 37% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (37%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (29%).
Prior Value
(29%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

40%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 40% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Kings has a value of 40% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (40%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (35%).
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

34%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 34% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (38%), Kings has a value of 34% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(38%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (34%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (27%).
Prior Value
(27%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

42.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 42.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (47.1%), Kings has a value of 42.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.0%).
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

24.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 20.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.6%), Kings has a value of 24.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (24.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

42.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 42.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (45.1%), Kings has a value of 42.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.2%).
Prior Value
(38.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

26.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 26.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 26.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.5%), Kings has a value of 26.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (26.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

49.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 49.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (49.2%), Kings has a value of 49.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (49.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (46.8%).
Prior Value
(46.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

28.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Kings has a value of 28.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

Current Value:

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Kings

43.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 43.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (46.6%), Kings has a value of 43.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (43.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (44.4%).
Prior Value
(44.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

Current Value:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Kings

25.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2%), Kings has a value of 25.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(29.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (25.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (26.9%).
Prior Value
(26.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

High School Graduation

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

High School Graduation

Value
Compared to:

High School Graduation County: Kings

Current Value:

High School Graduation County: Kings

79.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 79.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.2%), Kings has a value of 79.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Kings has a value of 79.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Kings (79.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (79.8%).
Prior Value
(79.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)