Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Tobacco Free Living

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking County: Kings

1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (1.2%), Kings has a value of 1.5%.
CA Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Kings has a value of 1.5%.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (1.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (1.6%).
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults who Smoke

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Smoke County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults who Smoke County: Kings

12.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 12.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Kings has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 12.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days County: Kings

7.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.5%), Kings has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Kings has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

Value
Compared to:

Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days County: Kings

1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.0%), Kings has a value of 1.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7%), Kings has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (1.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.8%).
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Kings

36.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 36.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 36.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 62.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,711 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (36.7), Kings has a value of 36.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(36.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (53.1), Kings has a value of 36.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(53.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (36.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.1).
Prior Value
(37.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Smoke: 11th Graders

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Smoke: 11th Graders

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Smoke: 11th Graders County: Kings

Current Value:

Teens who Smoke: 11th Graders County: Kings

3.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.0%), Kings has a value of 3.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Smoke: 7th Graders

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Smoke: 7th Graders

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Smoke: 7th Graders County: Kings

Current Value:

Teens who Smoke: 7th Graders County: Kings

0.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (1.0%), Kings has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (0.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Smoke: 9th Graders

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Teens who Smoke: 9th Graders

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Smoke: 9th Graders County: Kings

Current Value:

Teens who Smoke: 9th Graders County: Kings

2.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.0%), Kings has a value of 2.0%.
CA Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (2.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.