Search for Indicators
Maternal Wellness
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN County: Kings
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN County: Kings
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Kings has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Kings has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (15.3%) is less than the previously measured value (16.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Armona
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Armona
16.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Armona has a value of 16.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Armona has a value of 16.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Armona has a value of 16.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Armona (16.5%) is less than the previously measured value (17.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Armona value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Avenal
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Avenal
15.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Avenal has a value of 15.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Avenal has a value of 15.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Avenal has a value of 15.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Avenal (15.6%) is less than the previously measured value (16.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Avenal value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Corcoran
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Corcoran
13.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Corcoran has a value of 13.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Corcoran has a value of 13.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Corcoran has a value of 13.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Corcoran (13.6%) is less than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Corcoran value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Grangeville
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Grangeville
17.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Grangeville has a value of 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Grangeville has a value of 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Grangeville has a value of 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Grangeville (17.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (16.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Grangeville value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Hanford
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Hanford
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Hanford has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Hanford has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Hanford has a value of 15.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Hanford (15.3%) is less than the previously measured value (16.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Hanford value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Hardwick
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Hardwick
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Hardwick has a value of 13.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Hardwick has a value of 13.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Hardwick has a value of 13.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Hardwick (13.9%) is less than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Hardwick value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Home Garden
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Home Garden
14.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Home Garden has a value of 14.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Home Garden has a value of 14.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Home Garden has a value of 14.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Home Garden (14.7%) is less than the previously measured value (15.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Home Garden value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Kettleman City
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Kettleman City
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Kettleman City has a value of 12.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Kettleman City has a value of 12.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Kettleman City has a value of 12.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kettleman City (12.7%) is less than the previously measured value (14.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kettleman City value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Lemoore
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Lemoore
16.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Lemoore has a value of 16.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Lemoore has a value of 16.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Lemoore has a value of 16.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Lemoore (16.2%) is less than the previously measured value (17.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Lemoore value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Lemoore Station
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Lemoore Station
15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Lemoore Station has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Lemoore Station has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Lemoore Station has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Lemoore Station (15.4%) is less than the previously measured value (16.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Lemoore Station value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Stratford
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Place: Stratford
14.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), Stratford has a value of 14.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Stratford has a value of 14.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Stratford has a value of 14.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
![Compared to the prior value, Stratford (14.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (13.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Stratford value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93202
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93202
16.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93202 has a value of 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93202 (16.6%) is less than the previously measured value (17.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93202 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93204
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93204
15.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93204 has a value of 15.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93204 (15.5%) is less than the previously measured value (16.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93204 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93212
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93212
13.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93212 has a value of 13.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93212 (13.6%) is less than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93212 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93230
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93230
15.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93230 has a value of 15.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93230 (15.2%) is less than the previously measured value (15.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93230 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93239
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93239
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93239 has a value of 12.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93239 (12.7%) is less than the previously measured value (14.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93239 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93245
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93245
16.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93245 has a value of 16.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93245 (16.1%) is less than the previously measured value (17.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93245 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93246
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93246
15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93246 has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93246 (15.4%) is less than the previously measured value (17.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93266
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Zip Code: 93266
14.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 93266 has a value of 14.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93266 (14.2%) is greater than the previously measured value (13.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(13.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 93266 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000100
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000100
14.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000100 has a value of 14.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000100 (14.4%) is less than the previously measured value (14.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000100 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000200
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000200
14.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000200 has a value of 14.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000200 (14.7%) is greater than the previously measured value (14.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000200 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000300
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000300
16.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.1%), 06031000300 has a value of 16.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000300 (16.4%) is less than the previously measured value (21.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(21.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000402
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000402
18.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000402 has a value of 18.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000402 (18.5%) is greater than the previously measured value (17.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000402 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000403
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000403
15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000403 has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000403 (15.4%) is less than the previously measured value (17.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000403 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000404
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000404
17.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.1%), 06031000404 has a value of 17.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000404 (17.6%) is less than the previously measured value (18.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(18.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000405
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000405
15.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000405 has a value of 15.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000405 (15.2%) is less than the previously measured value (17.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000405 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000406
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000406
17.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000406 has a value of 17.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000407
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000407
16.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000407 has a value of 16.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000500
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000500
16.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000500 has a value of 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000500 (16.6%) is less than the previously measured value (16.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000500 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000601
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000601
17.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.1%), 06031000601 has a value of 17.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000601 (17.2%) is less than the previously measured value (20.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000602
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000602
15.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000602 has a value of 15.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000602 (15.7%) is less than the previously measured value (15.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000602 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000603
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000603
20.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000603 has a value of 20.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000604
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000604
18.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000604 has a value of 18.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000701
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000701
15.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000701 has a value of 15.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000701 (15.6%) is less than the previously measured value (15.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000701 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000702
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000702
14.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000702 has a value of 14.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000702 (14.8%) is less than the previously measured value (16.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000702 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000800
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000800
14.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000800 has a value of 14.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000800 (14.2%) is less than the previously measured value (15.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031000800 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000900
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000900
16.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.1%), 06031000900 has a value of 16.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031000900 (16.1%) is less than the previously measured value (18.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000901
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000901
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000901 has a value of 13.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000902
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031000902
11.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031000902 has a value of 11.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001001
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001001
17.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001001 has a value of 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001001 (17.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (16.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001001 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001002
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001002
13.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001002 has a value of 13.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001002 (13.7%) is less than the previously measured value (15.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001002 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001003
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001003
15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001003 has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001003 (15.4%) is less than the previously measured value (16.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001003 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001100
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001100
11.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001100 has a value of 11.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001100 (11.8%) is less than the previously measured value (13.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001100 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001200
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001200
13.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001200 has a value of 13.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001200 (13.5%) is less than the previously measured value (14.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001200 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001300
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001300
13.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001300 has a value of 13.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001300 (13.5%) is less than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001300 value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001401
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001401
14.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001401 has a value of 14.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001401 (14.4%) is less than the previously measured value (15.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001401 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001402
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001402
12.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001402 has a value of 12.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001402 (12.2%) is less than the previously measured value (15.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001402 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001500
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001500
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001500 has a value of 14.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001500 (14.1%) is less than the previously measured value (14.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001500 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001601
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001601
13.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001601 has a value of 13.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001601 (13.8%) is less than the previously measured value (14.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031001601 value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001602
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001602
0.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.1%), 06031001602 has a value of 0.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001602 (0.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001701
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001701
16.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.1%), 06031001701 has a value of 16.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031001701 (16.2%) is less than the previously measured value (19.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001702
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001702
16.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001702 has a value of 16.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001703
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031001703
14.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031001703 has a value of 14.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031980000
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031980000
15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031980000 has a value of 15.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031980100
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031980100
0.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031980100 has a value of 0.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031981800
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN Census Tract: 06031981800
0.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (15.3%), 06031981800 has a value of 0.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 06031981800 (0.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the 06031981800 value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding County: Kings
Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding County: Kings
89.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 89.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 94.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (93.8%), Kings has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
CA Value
(93.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (89.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(90.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Babies with Low Birthweight County: Kings
Babies with Low Birthweight County: Kings
6.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (7.2%), Kings has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
CA Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Kings has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Kings
Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Kings
268.5
Cases per 100,000 live births
(2020)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 268.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 46.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 151.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (114.9), Kings has a value of 268.5 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(114.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (268.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (95.2).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
Prior Value
(95.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
HP 2030 Target
(33.9)
In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding County: Kings
In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding County: Kings
60.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 60.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 72.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (68.5%), Kings has a value of 60.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
CA Value
(68.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (60.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Infant Mortality Rate County: Kings
Infant Mortality Rate County: Kings
4.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
![Compared to the CA Value (4.2), Kings has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (5.6), Kings has a value of 4.6 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (4.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(4.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93202
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93202
0.0*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2012)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (4.2), 93202 has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93202 (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.7).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
Prior Value
(14.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93204
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93204
0.0*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2012)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (4.2), 93204 has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93204 (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93212
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93212
6.6*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2011)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (6.2), 93212 has a value of 6.6 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(6.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93212 (6.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.5).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
Prior Value
(7.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93230
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93230
3.0*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2012)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (4.2), 93230 has a value of 3.0 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93239
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93239
0.0*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2012)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (4.2), 93239 has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93239 (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93245
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93245
2.7*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2012)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (4.2), 93245 has a value of 2.7 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93245 (2.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93266
Infant Mortality Rate Zip Code: 93266
0.0*
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2012)
Compared to:
![Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (4.2), 93266 has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
Kings, CA County Value
(4.2)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
![Compared to the prior value, 93266 (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
Value
Compared to:
Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care County: Kings
Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care County: Kings
88.3%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 84.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (87.9%), Kings has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
CA Value
(87.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Kings has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (88.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(84.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Preterm Births County: Kings
Preterm Births County: Kings
9.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (9.0%), Kings has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Respondents who are Aware of Free to Low-Cost Family Planning Services in the Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are Aware of Free to Low-Cost Family Planning Services in the Community County: Kings
Respondents who are Aware of Free to Low-Cost Family Planning Services in the Community County: Kings
58.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (58.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
Prior Value
(44.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (55.2%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Kings County 2023 Target
(55.2%)
Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 County: Kings
Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 County: Kings
18.8
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 18.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
![Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Kings has a value of 18.8 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
![Compared to the US Value (13.9), Kings has a value of 18.8 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (18.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
Prior Value
(20.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.