Disparities Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
County: Kings
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Kings has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.6), Kings has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 15.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 15.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.5), Kings has a value of 15.3 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (23.5), Kings has a value of 15.3 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (15.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
County: Kings Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose
County: Kings Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 13.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Kings has a value of 13.9 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (13.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 51.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Kings has a value of 51.5 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (51.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 8.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Kings has a value of 8.7 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (8.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Kings Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.1.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.0), Kings has a value of 16.6 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (27.2), Kings has a value of 16.6 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (3.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings
Health / Cancer
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 11.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Kings has a value of 11.9 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.1), Kings has a value of 11.9 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Kings Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 95.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 129.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 95.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (121.0), Kings has a value of 95.4 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (127.0), Kings has a value of 95.4 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (95.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (101.2).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Kings Cancer: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Kings Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 26.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 26.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (33.5), Kings has a value of 26.8 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (36.5), Kings has a value of 26.8 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (26.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Kings Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 37.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 37.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (37.6), Kings has a value of 37.1 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (54.0), Kings has a value of 37.1 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.2).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Kings Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 36.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 36.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (41.0%), Kings has a value of 36.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Kings has a value of 36.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (36.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
County: Kings Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Kings Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (10.1), Kings has a value of 10.9 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.9), Kings has a value of 10.9 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Kings Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 86.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 102.0.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 86.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (95.4), Kings has a value of 86.5 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (110.5), Kings has a value of 86.5 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (86.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.6).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Children's Health
County: Kings Child Mortality Rate: Under 20
County: Kings Child Mortality Rate: Under 20
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 45.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.7.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 45.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.0.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (37.7), Kings has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (50.6), Kings has a value of 45.4 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Diabetes
County: Kings Adults with Diabetes
County: Kings Adults with Diabetes
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Kings has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Kings has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Kings Diabetes: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Kings has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Kings has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (29.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Disabilities
County: Kings Children with a Disability
County: Kings Children with a Disability
![Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Kings has a value of 3.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Kings has a value of 3.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Kings Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Kings has a value of 5.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Kings has a value of 5.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with a Disability
County: Kings Persons with a Disability
![Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 12.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Kings has a value of 12.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Kings Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Kings has a value of 3.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Kings has a value of 3.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Kings Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Kings has a value of 2.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Kings has a value of 2.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Kings Persons with a Vision Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Kings has a value of 2.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Kings has a value of 2.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Kings Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Kings has a value of 6.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Kings has a value of 6.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
County: Kings
Health / Family Planning
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (58.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (55.2%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
County: Kings Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Kings Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 18.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Kings has a value of 18.8 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.9), Kings has a value of 18.8 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (18.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Kings Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Kings Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 90.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 91.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 90.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 88.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (90.2%), Kings has a value of 90.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (90.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Children with Health Insurance
County: Kings Children with Health Insurance
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 95.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 97.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 95.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Kings has a value of 95.9% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Kings has a value of 95.9% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (95.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
County: Kings People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care
County: Kings People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.5%), Kings has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings Persons with Health Insurance
County: Kings Persons with Health Insurance
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 92.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 92.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (91.9%), Kings has a value of 92.4% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (92.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
County: Kings Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Kings Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
![Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Kings has a value of 46.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Kings has a value of 46.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (46.7%) is less than the previously measured value (48.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Kings Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
![Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Kings has a value of 37.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Kings has a value of 37.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.1%) is greater than the previously measured value (36.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Kings Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 2,474 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,112 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,577.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 2,474 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,375.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (2,275), Kings has a value of 2,474 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (2,677), Kings has a value of 2,474 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (2,474) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,628).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Respondents Who Are Able to Access Medical Services
County: Kings Respondents Who Are Able to Access Medical Services
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (92.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (94.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (96.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services
County: Kings Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (79.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (31.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (4.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (36.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (48.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (46.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (30.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (28.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (21.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (13.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (86.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (87.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings
Health / Health Information Technology
County: Kings Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Kings Persons with an Internet Subscription
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 89.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Kings has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Kings has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (89.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (94.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (70.7%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
County: Kings
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
County: Kings Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Kings Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Kings Heart Failure: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (10.0%), Kings has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Kings High Blood Pressure Prevalence
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 34.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (34.8%), Kings has a value of 34.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Kings has a value of 34.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
County: Kings Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Kings Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Kings has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kings has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Kings Hypertension: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (58.0%), Kings has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Kings has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (68.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Kings Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (18.0%), Kings has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Kings has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (24.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Kings Stroke: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Kings has a value of 5.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kings has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
County: Kings Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Kings Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 44.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (48.0%), Kings has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Kings has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
County: Kings Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Kings Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 52.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 63.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 52.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (52.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
County: Kings Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Kings Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Kings has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Kings has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
County: Kings Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding
County: Kings Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 89.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 94.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (93.8%), Kings has a value of 89.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (89.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
County: Kings Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Kings Babies with Low Birthweight
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (7.2%), Kings has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Kings has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding
County: Kings In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 60.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 72.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (68.5%), Kings has a value of 60.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (60.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
County: Kings Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Kings Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 84.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (87.9%), Kings has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Kings has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (88.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
County: Kings Preterm Births
County: Kings Preterm Births
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (9.0%), Kings has a value of 9.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 51.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 60.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (55.9%), Kings has a value of 51.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (51.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 22.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (19.0%), Kings has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress
County: Kings Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Kings has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (10.5), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.9), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings Depression: Medicare Population
County: Kings Depression: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (9.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (70.9%) is greater than the previously measured value (55.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (45.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (21.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (26.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (33.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (13.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (60.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (47.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the No Comparison Data Available (0%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (40.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (61.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (57.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (30.9%) is greater than the previously measured value (14.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
County: Kings
Health / Mortality Data
County: Kings Life Expectancy
County: Kings Life Expectancy
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 77.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 78.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.5.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 77.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (79.9), Kings has a value of 77.3 which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (77.6), Kings has a value of 77.3 which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
County: Kings Premature Death
County: Kings Premature Death
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7,903.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7,959.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9,484.9.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 7,903.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9,469.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11,769.2.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (6,373.2), Kings has a value of 7,903.0 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Kings has a value of 7,903.0 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Kings Child and Teen Fruit Consumption
County: Kings Child and Teen Fruit Consumption
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 57.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 69.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (69.8%), Kings has a value of 57.3% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (57.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Respondents who don't feel full when eating healthy food
County: Kings Respondents who don't feel full when eating healthy food
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Respondents who don't have time to cook healthy food
County: Kings Respondents who don't have time to cook healthy food
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (24.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
County: Kings Respondents who don't know how to cook healthy food
County: Kings Respondents who don't know how to cook healthy food
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (18.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Respondents who don't like the taste of healthy food
County: Kings Respondents who don't like the taste of healthy food
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (30.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Respondents who feel healthy food is too expensive
County: Kings Respondents who feel healthy food is too expensive
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (45.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (44.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Respondents who need assistance with nutrition education
County: Kings Respondents who need assistance with nutrition education
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (12.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (41.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (72.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings Respondents whose family doesn't like healthy food
County: Kings Respondents whose family doesn't like healthy food
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings
Health / Older Adults
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Disability
![Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Kings has a value of 41.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Kings has a value of 41.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Kings has a value of 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Kings has a value of 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Kings has a value of 10.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Kings has a value of 10.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Kings Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Kings has a value of 7.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kings has a value of 7.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Kings Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
![Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Kings has a value of 19.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Kings has a value of 19.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Kings Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Kings has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Kings has a value of 6.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Other Conditions
County: Kings Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Kings Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (16.0%), Kings has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Kings has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Kings Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 31.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 31.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Kings has a value of 31.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Kings has a value of 31.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (31.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings
Health / Physical Activity
County: Kings Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Kings Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (15.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
County: Kings
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 7.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (7.4), Kings has a value of 7.9 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (12.0), Kings has a value of 7.9 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
County: Kings Death Rate due to Injuries
County: Kings Death Rate due to Injuries
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 62.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 70.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 106.7.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 62.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 111.2.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (58.9), Kings has a value of 62.7 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (80.0), Kings has a value of 62.7 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Kings Adults with Asthma
County: Kings Adults with Asthma
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (16.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Kings Asthma: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Kings has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings COPD: Medicare Population
County: Kings COPD: Medicare Population
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Kings has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: Kings Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Kings Chlamydia Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 675.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 344.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.7.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (484.7), Kings has a value of 675.1 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (495.5), Kings has a value of 675.1 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (675.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (652.7).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Kings Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 210.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 140.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 212.7.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (230.9), Kings has a value of 210.9 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (214.0), Kings has a value of 210.9 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (210.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (203.6).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Kings Syphilis Incidence Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 17.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (22.3), Kings has a value of 17.6 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (16.2), Kings has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.3).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings
Health / Weight Status
County: Kings 5th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese
County: Kings 5th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 47.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (41.3%), Kings has a value of 47.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (47.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (45.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
County: Kings 9th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese
County: Kings 9th Grade Students who are Overweight or Obese
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 42.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.3%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (37.8%), Kings has a value of 42.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (42.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Adults Who Are Obese
County: Kings Adults Who Are Obese
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (28.8%), Kings has a value of 32.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Kings has a value of 32.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (32.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (50.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings Adults who are Overweight or Obese
County: Kings Adults who are Overweight or Obese
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 72.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Kings has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Kings has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (72.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
County: Kings Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
County: Kings Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 83.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (86.0%), Kings has a value of 83.8% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (83.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
County: Kings
Community / Children's Social Environment
County: Kings Respondents who need assistance with youth activities
County: Kings Respondents who need assistance with youth activities
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
County: Kings
Community / Civic Engagement
County: Kings Voter Engagement
County: Kings Voter Engagement
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 48.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 71.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (66.2%), Kings has a value of 48.3% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (48.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
County: Kings
Community / Community & Business Resources
County: Kings Respondents who turn to a counselor in times of crisis
County: Kings Respondents who turn to a counselor in times of crisis
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (23.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (16.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Respondents who turn to a doctor in times of crisis
County: Kings Respondents who turn to a doctor in times of crisis
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.3%) is greater than the previously measured value (12.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.7%) is greater than the previously measured value (2.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (17.6%) is greater than the previously measured value (10.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (27.0%) is greater than the previously measured value (14.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.5%) is greater than the previously measured value (7.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
County: Kings Adult Arrest Rate
County: Kings Adult Arrest Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 49.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Kings has a value of 49.9 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (49.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (62.9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
County: Kings Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 6.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 6.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (5.1), Kings has a value of 6.5 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (6.6), Kings has a value of 6.5 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (6.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
County: Kings Deaths in Custody
County: Kings Deaths in Custody
![Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Kings has a value of 2.9 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (2.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
County: Kings Juvenile Arrest Rate
County: Kings Juvenile Arrest Rate
![Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 7.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the CA Value (2.8), Kings has a value of 7.1 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (10.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
County: Kings
Community / Demographics
County: Kings Foreign Born Persons
County: Kings Foreign Born Persons
![Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Kings has a value of 18.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-neutral.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Kings has a value of 18.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-neutral.png)
County: Kings Respondents between 18-24 Years Old
County: Kings Respondents between 18-24 Years Old
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (7.2%) is greater than the previously measured value (5.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-neutral.png)
County: Kings Respondents who Answered in English
County: Kings Respondents who Answered in English
![Compared to the prior value, Kings (96.9%) is greater than the previously measured value (90.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-neutral.png)