Search for Indicators
Monthly Spotlight
Monthly Spotlight: Health Insurance
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care
Value
Compared to:
Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Kings
Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Kings
23.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(22.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services
Value
Compared to:
Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services County: Kings
Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services County: Kings
51.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(55.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet
Value
Compared to:
Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet County: Kings
Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet County: Kings
28.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(33.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Kings
Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Kings
66.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist County: Kings
Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist County: Kings
10.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
51.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist County: Kings
Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist County: Kings
12.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN County: Kings
Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN County: Kings
15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Kings
Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64 County: Kings
90.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(90.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(90.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with HMO Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with HMO Health Insurance County: Kings
12.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance County: Kings
14.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Medicare Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with Medicare Health Insurance County: Kings
14.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Military Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with Military Health Insurance County: Kings
4.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with Other Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with Other Health Insurance County: Kings
6.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with POS Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with POS Health Insurance County: Kings
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults with PPO Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults with PPO Health Insurance County: Kings
32.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Adults without Health Insurance County: Kings
Adults without Health Insurance County: Kings
15.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Children who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
Children who Visited a Dentist County: Kings
87.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(91.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with Health Insurance County: Kings
Children with Health Insurance County: Kings
95.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Dentist Rate County: Kings
Dentist Rate County: Kings
63
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(93)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(60)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Cancer Medical Services County: Kings
Households that Received Cancer Medical Services County: Kings
7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services County: Kings
Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services County: Kings
10.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room County: Kings
Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room County: Kings
28.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility County: Kings
Households that Received Medical Services in an Urgent Care Facility County: Kings
25.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(25.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services County: Kings
Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services County: Kings
9.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services County: Kings
Households that Received Pediatric Medical Services County: Kings
12.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
Value
Compared to:
Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services County: Kings
Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services County: Kings
1.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Kings
Mental Health Provider Rate County: Kings
236
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(450)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(224)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate County: Kings
Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate County: Kings
92
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(87)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(86)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care
Value
Compared to:
People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Kings
People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Kings
12.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.9%)
People with a Usual Source of Health Care County: Kings
People with a Usual Source of Health Care County: Kings
85.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(82.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(85.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Health Insurance County: Kings
Persons with Health Insurance County: Kings
92.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(92.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(92.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Kings
Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Kings
46.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Kings
Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Kings
37.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
Value
Compared to:
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Kings
Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Kings
2,474
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(2,275)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,628)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Primary Care Provider Rate County: Kings
Primary Care Provider Rate County: Kings
37
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(38)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents Who Are Able to Access Medical Services
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Are Able to Access Medical Services County: Kings
Respondents Who Are Able to Access Medical Services County: Kings
92.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(94.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(96.0%)
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services County: Kings
Respondents who are Able to Access Mental Health Services County: Kings
70.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(55.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services County: Kings
Respondents who are Able to Access Telehealth Services County: Kings
79.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are Aware of Free to Low-Cost Family Planning Services in the Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are Aware of Free to Low-Cost Family Planning Services in the Community County: Kings
Respondents who are Aware of Free to Low-Cost Family Planning Services in the Community County: Kings
58.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(44.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Kings County 2023 Target
(55.2%)
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to a lack of childcare
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to a lack of childcare County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to a lack of childcare County: Kings
4.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to a lack of local specialists
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to a lack of local specialists County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to a lack of local specialists County: Kings
36.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to finances
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to finances County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to finances County: Kings
17.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to having no insurance
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to having no insurance County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to having no insurance County: Kings
22.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(48.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to healthcare hours
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to healthcare hours County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to healthcare hours County: Kings
46.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to lack of transportation
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to lack of transportation County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to lack of transportation County: Kings
37.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to scheduling conflicts
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to scheduling conflicts County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access medical services due to scheduling conflicts County: Kings
30.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to a lack of childcare County: Kings
20.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to an inability to find a provider
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to an inability to find a provider County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to an inability to find a provider County: Kings
37.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(45.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to finances County: Kings
34.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to having no insurance County: Kings
21.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to lack of transportation County: Kings
26.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to not being covered by insurance
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to not being covered by insurance County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to not being covered by insurance County: Kings
10.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to provider hours County: Kings
33.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access mental health services due to stigma County: Kings
22.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to finances
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to finances County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to finances County: Kings
17.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no cell phone
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no cell phone County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no cell phone County: Kings
28.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no computer
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no computer County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no computer County: Kings
17.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no internet service
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no internet service County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to having no internet service County: Kings
21.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to lack of privacy
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to lack of privacy County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to lack of privacy County: Kings
20.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to not feeling secure
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to not feeling secure County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to not feeling secure County: Kings
9.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to provider hours
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to provider hours County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to provider hours County: Kings
42.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to stigma
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to stigma County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to stigma County: Kings
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to the service being impersonal
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to the service being impersonal County: Kings
Respondents who are unable to access telehealth services due to the service being impersonal County: Kings
22.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community County: Kings
Respondents who Have Used Mental Health Services in the Community County: Kings
30.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents who need assistance with accessing medical coverage
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who need assistance with accessing medical coverage County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with accessing medical coverage County: Kings
14.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents Who Stated Their Families Are Covered by Health Insurance
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Stated Their Families Are Covered by Health Insurance County: Kings
Respondents Who Stated Their Families Are Covered by Health Insurance County: Kings
86.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(87.0%)
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Respondents whose Household Experienced Reduced Work Hours of Wages due to the COVID Pandemic
Value
Compared to:
Respondents whose Household Experienced Reduced Work Hours of Wages due to the COVID Pandemic County: Kings
Respondents whose Household Experienced Reduced Work Hours of Wages due to the COVID Pandemic County: Kings
24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
