Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) come in many forms, from physical and mental abuse to neglect and household dysfunction. In 1998, CDC-Kaiser Permanente published a groundbreaking study that investigated the impact of ACEs on physical and mental health problems in over 17,000 adults. During the study, the adults were given a survey asking about 10 different types of ACEs and if they had experienced them prior to the age of 18. The study showed a direct correlation between ACEs and future health complications.

10 ACEs, as identified by the CDC-Kaiser study:
ABUSE NEGLECT HOUSEHOLD DYSFUNCTION
Physical  Physical Mental illness Incarcerated relative
Emotional Emotional Mother treated violently Substance abuse
Sexual Divorce
 
Source: https://www.joiningforcesforchildren.org/what-are-aces/

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Adult Arrest Rate

Value
Compared to:

Adult Arrest Rate

Value
Compared to:

Adult Arrest Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Adult Arrest Rate County: Kings

49.9
Arrests per 1,000 population 18+
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 49.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Kings has a value of 49.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (49.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (62.9).
Prior Value
(62.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Kings

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Kings has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Armona

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Armona

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Armona has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Armona has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Avenal

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Avenal

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Avenal has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Corcoran

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Corcoran

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Corcoran has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Grangeville

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Grangeville

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Grangeville has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hanford

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hanford

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Hanford has a value of 16.9%.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hanford has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hardwick

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hardwick

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hardwick has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Home Garden

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Home Garden

13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Home Garden has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Kettleman City

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Kettleman City

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Kettleman City has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore

17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lemoore has a value of 17.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore Station

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Lemoore Station

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Lemoore Station has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Stratford

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Stratford

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (16.9%), Stratford has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Stratford has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults Who Ever Thought Seriously About Committing Suicide County: Kings

22.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 22.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (19.0%), Kings has a value of 22.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (22.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress County: Kings

Current Value:

Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress County: Kings

20.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Kings has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (20.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.5%).
Prior Value
(16.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide County: Kings

14.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 47 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.5), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Kings has a value of 14.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings

23.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Kings has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Kings has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Armona

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Armona

18.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 18.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 18.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Armona has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Armona has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Armona has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Armona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Avenal

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Avenal

27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Avenal has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Avenal value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Corcoran

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Corcoran

38.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Corcoran has a value of 38.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corcoran value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Grangeville

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Grangeville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Grangeville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hanford

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hanford

20.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hanford has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hanford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hardwick

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hardwick

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hardwick value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Home Garden

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Home Garden

19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Home Garden has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Home Garden value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Kettleman City

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Kettleman City

54.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Kettleman City has a value of 54.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kettleman City value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore

21.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Lemoore has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lemoore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore Station

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Lemoore Station

14.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Lemoore Station has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lemoore Station value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Stratford

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Stratford

28.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (23.0%), Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Stratford has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Stratford value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Kings

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Kings has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Frequent Mental Distress

Value
Compared to:

Frequent Mental Distress

Value
Compared to:

Frequent Mental Distress County: Kings

Current Value:

Frequent Mental Distress County: Kings

14.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 14.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Kings has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (14.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings

Current Value:

Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings

21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Kings has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (21.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.6%).
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Agreed Suicide has Seriously Affected Their Lives County: Kings

34.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (9.9%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(9.9%)

Respondents who Have Been Victims of Violence in their Homes County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents who Have Been Victims of Violence in their Homes County: Kings

34.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (34.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.6%).
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (11.7%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(11.7%)

Respondents Who Have Witnessed Violence In their Home County: Kings

Current Value:

Respondents Who Have Witnessed Violence In their Home County: Kings

37.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Kings (37.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Kings County 2023 Target (11.5%), the target has not been met.
Kings County 2023 Target
(11.5%)

Children in Single-Parent Households County: Kings

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households County: Kings

24.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 24.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 24.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Kings has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Kings has a value of 24.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Armona

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Armona

7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Armona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Armona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Armona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Armona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Avenal

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Avenal

35.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Avenal has a value of 35.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Avenal value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Corcoran

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Corcoran

36.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Corcoran has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corcoran value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Grangeville

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Grangeville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Grangeville value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hanford

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hanford

23.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hanford has a value of 23.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hanford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hardwick

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Hardwick

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hardwick has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hardwick value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Home Garden

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Home Garden

37.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Home Garden has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Home Garden value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Kettleman City

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Kettleman City

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kettleman City value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore

21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lemoore has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lemoore value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore Station

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Lemoore Station

11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Lemoore Station has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lemoore Station value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Stratford

Current Value:

Children in Single-Parent Households Census Place: Stratford

30.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (24.7%), Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(24.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Stratford has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Stratford value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Teens who have Used Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Teens who have Used Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Teens who have Used Alcohol County: Kings

Current Value:

Teens who have Used Alcohol County: Kings

40.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 40.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
CA Counties
(2011-2012)
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
Compared to the CA Value (23.1%), Kings has a value of 40.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(23.1% in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Kings (40.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Kings value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Youth not in School or Working County: Kings

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Kings

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Kings has a value of 2.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Kings has a value of 2.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Kings has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Kings has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kings value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Armona

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Armona

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Armona has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Armona has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Armona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Armona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Armona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Armona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Avenal

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Avenal

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Avenal has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Avenal value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Corcoran

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Corcoran

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Corcoran has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corcoran value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Grangeville

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Grangeville

0.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,288 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,272 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (7.9%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(7.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6.6%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Grangeville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hanford

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hanford

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hanford has a value of 2.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hanford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hardwick

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Hardwick

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Hardwick has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hardwick value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Home Garden

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Home Garden

16.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Home Garden has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Home Garden value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Kettleman City

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Kettleman City

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Kettleman City has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Kettleman City value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lemoore has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lemoore value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore Station

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Lemoore Station

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Lemoore Station has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Lemoore Station value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Stratford

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working Census Place: Stratford

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Kings, CA County Value (2.6%), Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Kings, CA County Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Kings County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Stratford has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Stratford value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.