Search for Indicators
Financial Stability
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Economy / Employment
Employer Establishments County: Kings
Employer Establishments County: Kings
1,725
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,707)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Kings
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Kings
49.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Kings
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Kings
45.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Employment
Respondents Who Feel a Lack of Job Skills Have Prevented Them From Obtaining a Job
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Feel a Lack of Job Skills Have Prevented Them From Obtaining a Job County: Kings
Respondents Who Feel a Lack of Job Skills Have Prevented Them From Obtaining a Job County: Kings
39.7
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(24.0)
Economy / Employment
Respondents who feel a lack of job skills or education have prevented anyone in their household from obtaining a better paying job
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who feel a lack of job skills or education have prevented anyone in their household from obtaining a better paying job County: Kings
Respondents who feel a lack of job skills or education have prevented anyone in their household from obtaining a better paying job County: Kings
44.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(59.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Employment
Respondents Who Had a Member of the Household Experience a Sudden Loss of Income In the Last Two Years
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Had a Member of the Household Experience a Sudden Loss of Income In the Last Two Years County: Kings
Respondents Who Had a Member of the Household Experience a Sudden Loss of Income In the Last Two Years County: Kings
46.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Kings County 2023 Target
(30.8%)
Respondents who need assistance with employment County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with employment County: Kings
18.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Respondents who need assistance with job training County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with job training County: Kings
16.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Employment
Respondents Whose Household Experienced a Major Change in Income
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Whose Household Experienced a Major Change in Income County: Kings
Respondents Whose Household Experienced a Major Change in Income County: Kings
61.0%
Percent of respondents
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(48.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Economy / Employment
Respondents whose Household Experienced Reduced Work Hours of Wages due to the COVID Pandemic
Value
Compared to:
Respondents whose Household Experienced Reduced Work Hours of Wages due to the COVID Pandemic County: Kings
Respondents whose Household Experienced Reduced Work Hours of Wages due to the COVID Pandemic County: Kings
24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Size of Labor Force County: Kings
Size of Labor Force County: Kings
57,887
Persons
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(57,530)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Kings
Total Employment County: Kings
26,017
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(25,988)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Kings
Total Employment Change County: Kings
0.1%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(-5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Kings
Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Kings
8.0%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Food Insecurity
Adults Receiving Food Stamp Benefits County: Kings
Adults Receiving Food Stamp Benefits County: Kings
37.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(31.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Food Insecurity
Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance
Value
Compared to:
Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Kings
Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Kings
23%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(34%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Kings
Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Kings
67.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Kings
Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Kings
4,930
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Projected Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
Projected Food Insecurity Rate County: Kings
14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Food Insecurity
Respondents Who Feel They Are Able to Access Food Within Their Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Feel They Are Able to Access Food Within Their Community County: Kings
Respondents Who Feel They Are Able to Access Food Within Their Community County: Kings
90.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(92.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Kings County 2023 Target
(100%)
Economy / Food Insecurity
Respondents Who Feel They Won't Have Enough Food to Feed Their Family
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Feel They Won't Have Enough Food to Feed Their Family County: Kings
Respondents Who Feel They Won't Have Enough Food to Feed Their Family County: Kings
43.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(30.0%)
Economy / Food Insecurity
Respondents who Have Used Food Assistance in the Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Have Used Food Assistance in the Community County: Kings
Respondents who Have Used Food Assistance in the Community County: Kings
39.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(35.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Respondents who need assistance with food County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with food County: Kings
22.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program County: Kings
Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program County: Kings
65.2%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Chronically Homeless County: Kings
Chronically Homeless County: Kings
83
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(69)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Experiencing Homelessness in Kings County County: Kings
Experiencing Homelessness in Kings County County: Kings
417
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(313)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Homeless people with a disability County: Kings
Homeless people with a disability County: Kings
159
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(121)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Homeless Veterans of the Armed Forces County: Kings
Homeless Veterans of the Armed Forces County: Kings
27
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Kings
Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Kings
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Homeownership County: Kings
Homeownership County: Kings
51.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Individuals who slept in emergency shelter County: Kings
Individuals who slept in emergency shelter County: Kings
80
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(98)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Individuals who slept in transitional housing County: Kings
Individuals who slept in transitional housing County: Kings
27
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Individuals who slept in unsheltered location County: Kings
Individuals who slept in unsheltered location County: Kings
310
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(191)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Median Household Gross Rent County: Kings
Median Household Gross Rent County: Kings
$1,201
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
Value
Compared to:
Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Kings
Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Kings
$531
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Kings
Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Kings
$1,721
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing
Value
Compared to:
Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Kings
Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Kings
37.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Overcrowded Households County: Kings
Overcrowded Households County: Kings
8.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
Value
Compared to:
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Kings
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Kings
45.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Residential Segregation - Black/White County: Kings
Residential Segregation - Black/White County: Kings
36.3
Score
(2024)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,076 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(58.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(62.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Respondents who Need Assistance with Affordable Housing
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who Need Assistance with Affordable Housing County: Kings
Respondents who Need Assistance with Affordable Housing County: Kings
24.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Respondents with 1-2 people in their household County: Kings
Respondents with 1-2 people in their household County: Kings
19.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Respondents with 3-5 people in their household County: Kings
Respondents with 3-5 people in their household County: Kings
65.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(54.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Respondents with 6 or more people in their household County: Kings
Respondents with 6 or more people in their household County: Kings
14.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Unaccompanied youth who are homeless County: Kings
Unaccompanied youth who are homeless County: Kings
13
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Income
Gender Pay Gap County: Kings
Gender Pay Gap County: Kings
$0.70
Cents on the dollar
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
($0.74)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
($0.72)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Households Above the Federal Poverty Level and Below the Real Cost Measure
Value
Compared to:
Households Above the Federal Poverty Level and Below the Real Cost Measure County: Kings
Households Above the Federal Poverty Level and Below the Real Cost Measure County: Kings
28.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 California counties.
CA Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Households Below the Real Cost Measure County: Kings
Households Below the Real Cost Measure County: Kings
42.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 California counties.
CA Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Economy / Income
Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold
Value
Compared to:
Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold County: Kings
Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold County: Kings
46.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(55.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Income
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)
Value
Compared to:
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Kings
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Kings
37.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(28.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Income Inequality County: Kings
Income Inequality County: Kings
0.413
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Median Household Income County: Kings
Median Household Income County: Kings
$68,540
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Per Capita Income County: Kings
Per Capita Income County: Kings
$26,193
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of $12,000 or less
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of $12,000 or less County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of $12,000 or less County: Kings
6.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $12,000 to $16,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $12,000 to $16,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $12,000 to $16,000 County: Kings
6.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $16,000 to $20,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $16,000 to $20,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $16,000 to $20,000 County: Kings
5.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $20,000 to $25,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $20,000 to $25,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $20,000 to $25,000 County: Kings
8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $25,000 to $30,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $25,000 to $30,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $25,000 to $30,000 County: Kings
4.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $30,000 to $35,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $30,000 to $35,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $30,000 to $35,000 County: Kings
6.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $35,000 to $40,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $35,000 to $40,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $35,000 to $40,000 County: Kings
7.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $40,000 to $50,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $40,000 to $50,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $40,000 to $50,000 County: Kings
11.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $50,000 to $65,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $50,000 to $65,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $50,000 to $65,000 County: Kings
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $65,000 to $80,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $65,000 to $80,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $65,000 to $80,000 County: Kings
12.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $80,000 to $100,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $80,000 to $100,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of between $80,000 to $100,000 County: Kings
8.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of over $100,000
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of over $100,000 County: Kings
Respondents who reported annual household incomes of over $100,000 County: Kings
11.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Respondents whose household experienced a decrease in income County: Kings
Respondents whose household experienced a decrease in income County: Kings
59.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Respondents whose household experienced an increase in income County: Kings
Respondents whose household experienced an increase in income County: Kings
40.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
No Comparison Data Available
(0%)
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens
Value
Compared to:
Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens County: Kings
Adults who Feel Overwhelmed by Financial Burdens County: Kings
40.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(36.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops
Value
Compared to:
Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops County: Kings
Households that Used Check Cashing, Cash Advance, or Title Loan Shops County: Kings
2.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Households with a 401k Plan County: Kings
Households with a 401k Plan County: Kings
36.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Households with a Savings Account County: Kings
Households with a Savings Account County: Kings
68.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(73.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Households with Student Loan Debt County: Kings
Households with Student Loan Debt County: Kings
10.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Respondents who need assistance with household budgeting
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who need assistance with household budgeting County: Kings
Respondents who need assistance with household budgeting County: Kings
16.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Poverty
Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Kings
Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Kings
19.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
56.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(35.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(36.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
23.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
35.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
28.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings
People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Kings
1,846
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People Living 200% Above Poverty Level County: Kings
People Living 200% Above Poverty Level County: Kings
59.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level County: Kings
40.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
People Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
People Living Below Poverty Level County: Kings
16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
Economy / Poverty
Respondents who are Currently Having Trouble Paying Rent or Mortgage
Value
Compared to:
Respondents who are Currently Having Trouble Paying Rent or Mortgage County: Kings
Respondents who are Currently Having Trouble Paying Rent or Mortgage County: Kings
43.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Kings County 2023 Target
(21.0%)
Economy / Poverty
Respondents Who Are Having Trouble Affording an Apartment or House in Their Community
Value
Compared to:
Respondents Who Are Having Trouble Affording an Apartment or House in Their Community County: Kings
Respondents Who Are Having Trouble Affording an Apartment or House in Their Community County: Kings
59.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(23.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(32.0%)
Respondents Who Are Having Trouble Paying Their Utility Bills County: Kings
Respondents Who Are Having Trouble Paying Their Utility Bills County: Kings
45.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Kings County 2023 Target
(28.0%)
Youth not in School or Working County: Kings
Youth not in School or Working County: Kings
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
